axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


The media war Israel cannot win Printer friendly page Print This
By Bradley Burston
Haaretz
Tuesday, May 25, 2004

 

 

The longer a war lasts, the more ways there are to lose it.

 

The principle is not lost on the officials of the Foreign Ministry and the IDF spokesperson unit, Israel's front-line troops in the media war with the Arabs. From the standpoint of domestic morale as well as that of international diplomacy, the officials have long stressed that the media war is of critical importance to Israel's future.

Of late, some have suggested, it is also the war that
Israel cannot win.

Even before the IDF launched its Rafah offensive last week, it was clear to many that the division-strength incursion would pose the most difficult challenge in years to the effort to argue
Israel's case abroad.

Braced for broad condemnation from the Islamic world,
Europe and the United Nations, as well as media outlets often critical of Israel, officials charged with the Jewish state's campaign of public relations - known by the prosaic Hebrew term "hasbara," ("explanation") - found themselves struggling from the outset to counter attacks based on statements by their own leaders.

Last week, on the eve of the IDF push called Operation Rainbow, a comment to the weekly cabinet meeting by Chief of Staff Moshe Ya'alon made headlines - and touched off condemnation of
Israel - worldwide.

"Hundreds of houses have been marked for destruction," Ya'alon was quoted as saying, in a comment that resounded as ominous as it was unspecific. It was widely reported abroad as an indication of an imminent military design that would leave thousands of Palestinians homeless.

Already under strong pressure, Brigadier General Ruth Yaron, commander of the IDF Spokesman Unit, conceded early in the operation that although foreign journalists had shown understanding for
Israel's bid to counter arms-smuggling tunnels dug under the Philadelphi security route marking the Egypt-Rafah border, the images of the operation were difficult to digest.

"The pictures are very difficult," she said. "War is something that photographs very badly. It looks very bad, and, in fact, it is very bad."

Foreign Ministry Director-General Yoav Biran said Israel's official spokesmen would continue to press its case of self-defense, but his words also bore a Sisyphean tone of failure foretold.

Responding to nearly immediate charges by Palestinians that Israeli forces were guilty of war crimes and, in Yasser Arafat's words, "planned massacres," Biran said:

"Every picture from Rafah is very difficult, of women, of children, outside of their homes, sitting amongst the contents of those homes, which were far from luxurious to begin with, especially when they are framed with Israeli tanks."

"As for the struggle in the visual sphere," Biran said, "I feel that we will not succeed."

Warning shot - from a helicopter gunship


Hours after Yaron and Biran spoke on Wednesday morning, conflicting, emotion-laden and dire reports broke of the bloody outcome of a protest march in Rafah's battle-torn Tel Sultan neighborhood.

Initial Palestinian witness accounts spoke of an Israeli helicopter gunship firing four missiles on marchers, many if not most of them children, with dozens feared dead.

The army spokesman unit, balancing the need for timely official comment with an authoritative, airtight explanation for what had happened, was formally silent for hours.

In the meantime, Israeli politicians raced to fill the breach, to the further horror of hasbara authorities. Deputy Public Security Minister Gideon Ezra said in nationally broadcast remarks, "If innocent people wish to avoid getting hurt, they should distance themselves from events of this sort."

Ezra said that armed Palestinians had hidden themselves among the demonstrators, and that the soldiers and their commanders were duty-bound to defend themselves when the march threatened troops in the area.

"We give the commanders - with all their responsibility - all of our support, and understand that when there is a life-and-death threat, we don't simply throw up our hands," he said.

At the same time, speaking from the Knesset floor in a frenzy of outrage, MK Ahmed Tibi from the Jewish-Arab Hadash party said: "This pilot, your beloved son, sent missiles from a helicopter in order to kill Palestinian children. His mother should be ashamed - her boy is a cold-blooded murderer. This pilot is a murderer. His commanding officer is a murderer. The commander of the air force is a murderer. The Southern Front commander is a murderer."

Tibi added that Ya'alon, Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, the Israel Air Force and Southern Front commanders all belonged in the defendants' dock in a war crimes trial.

Said fellow Arab MK Taleb a-Sana, "What happened in Rafah proves that you don't have to be German to be a Nazi."

When an official announcement finally came, nearly four hours after the attack, the explanations by Ya'alon and Mofaz raised eyebrows anew as the military admitted, by implication, that its first resort in crowd control had been use of an attack helicopter.

Ya'alon said that while a helicopter had indeed launched a missile, it had fired at an open field as a "warning shot" to deter demonstrators from advancing on IDF forces.

An armored battalion officer then ordered a tank crew to carry out what was called deterrent fire as well - a procedure widely reported to have been barred in the IDF after shells inadvertently killed civilians in the West Bank towns of Jenin and Nablus two years before.

At least one of the tank shells missed its mark, exploding into the crowd. Amid vivid depictions of bodies being stored in produce refrigerators for lack of morgue space in dusty, poverty-bound Rafah, investigations later found that the tank fire had claimed eight dead.

"It's clear that the battle's lost," a Foreign Ministry official told Yedioth Ahronoth late last Wednesday. "No matter what we say, we've already been defeated in this battle for public opinion. This incident is simply impossible to explain."

Nearly a week later, IDF Gaza division commander Brigadier General Shmuel Zakai said Monday that the investigation into that incident has not yet been completed, but it appears as if the tank commander who fired a shell at the abandoned structure did not see the nearby demonstration.

"We did not use the tank shell in order to disperse the demonstration but rather to create a boom effect," Zakai said. "To the best of my professional judgement, the tank commander's decision was correct."

Monsters in the world's eyes


Complicating the hasbara effort were widely divergent reports over the number of Rafah homes destroyed during the operation. By the count of a military source Sunday, the number of demolished homes was between six and 10, with several more damaged in exchanges of fire with gunmen.

A United Nations source said Israel had leveled dozens of homes. A Palestinian official put the figure in the hundreds.

The coup de grace for Israel's hasbara campaign may have come this week, and as close to home as Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's inner security cabinet.

Justice Minister Yosef Lapid, a Holocaust survivor who lost his father and grandmother to the Nazi extermination machine, touched off pandemonium in the cabinet when he spoke of his reaction to a photograph of an old woman in Rafah, searching on all fours through the rubble for her medication. Lapid told the ministers that the scene made him think of his grandmother.

Although he later flatly denied that he had intended to draw a parallel between the actions of the IDF and those of the Nazis, Lapid's response to the Rafah campaign had only begun.

In an Army Radio interview following the cabinet meeting, Lapid revealed that the army was considering the demolition of some 2,000 homes in Rafah, in order to broaden the Philadelphi corridor between Egypt and Gaza.

"The demolition of houses in Rafah must stop. It is not humane, not Jewish, and causes us grave damage in the world," declared Lapid, leader of the secular-centrist Shinui. A confidante of Sharon and a former journalist and social critic, Lapid has generally supported tough military policies in fighting the Palestinians.

Specifying the potential damage in the international community, Lapid said: "At the end of the day, they'll kick us out of the United Nations, try those responsible in the international court in The Hague, and no one will want to speak with us."

Military officials later confirmed for the first time that commanders are weighing plans which would level between 700 and 2,000 homes.

"We look like monsters in the eyes of the world," Lapid said in a separate national radio broadcast. "This makes me sick."

'Bad people have celebrations, too'


To be sure, official Israel's attitude toward world opinion has long been ambivalent at best. Founding prime minister David Ben-Gurion's dismissals of the relative importance of UN condemnations and international scorn ("It matters not what the goyim say, but what the Jews do") are the stuff of legend.

The Israeli national characteristic of "dugriut," unfiltered candor, also mitigates against the tenets of public relations, as did the once common practice of handing out key spokesman and emissary positions on a patronage basis, with recipients often unable to express themselves in foreign languages.

Yet another factor is the widely held suspicion that no matter what, the actions of Israelis will be judged more harshly than those taken by the forces of other nations.

If Israelis suspected a certain double standard in media coverage in the Tel Sultan march, evidence of a sort was not long in coming.

As world news attention remained riveted on the Rafah march, many newspapers relegated to below-the-fold or back pages an American air strike near Iraq's border with Syria, an incident that took place just hours after the Tel Sultan deaths.

Israeli spokesmen could only marvel at the muted reaction to the U.S. strike, which left more than 40 dead. Witnesses on the ground had said the victims were hit while sleeping after a wedding. U.S. forces said the rude structures hit were a safe house for foreign fighters.

In a statement that one Israeli commentator said would have provoked UN Security Council debate had it been made by the IDF, Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, chief U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, said Saturday:

"There may have been some kind of celebration. Bad people have celebrations, too."

 

 

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=431465&displayTypeCd=1&sideCd=1&contrassID=2

Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |