Axis of Logic
Finding Clarity in the 21st Century Mediaplex

Human Rights
The banality of Abu Ghraib
By Robert Perkinson
The Daily Times (Pakistan)
Wednesday, Jun 2, 2004

As more images of debased Iraqi detainees ricochet around the world, many viewers are as bewildered as they are outraged. How could ordinary American soldiers, whether they were following orders or acting on their own, appear so untroubled, even exhilarated by their brutish conduct?

To be sure, over-eager military-intelligence interrogators, as well as the Bush administration’s high-handed attitude toward international law, helped precipitate the crisis. But few commentators have focused enough attention on the site of this macabre theatre — not a battlefield, but a prison.

Prison experts are the least surprised by the grotesque reports filtering out of Abu Ghraib. They recognise that prisons, as uniquely divisive and authoritarian institutions, regularly give rise to behaviours that appear depraved to the wider world but come to seem acceptable — even normal — behind bars. Indeed, some of the most publicised prison scandals have erupted in the United States, which incarcerates more people in absolute and per capita terms than any other country.

Compared to Saddam Hussein’s murderous old regime at Abu Ghraib, of course, American prisons are relatively well managed. But as mandatory sentencing rules have landed more and more Americans behind bars, incidents that bear a disquieting resemblance to the degenerate cruelties photographed in
Iraq have come increasingly to light.

The connection is no accident. Some of the
US scandals tie American prison personnel directly to Abu Ghraib.

In
Virginia, for instance, human rights advocates report that inmates at two ‘supermax’ prisons have been hooded and subjected to ‘excessive and malicious use of force by prison staff,’ often involving electric shock devices and rubber bullets. John J Armstrong, now the assistant director of operations for US prisons in Iraq, resigned from his previous post when he was named in two wrongful death lawsuits at one of those prisons. Sergeant Ivan Frederick, the man directly in charge of the infamous Abu Ghraib ‘hard site,’ previously worked as a Virginia corrections officer.

In
Pennsylvania, a 1998 inquiry into a supermax prison notorious for racist guards revealed videotapes of routine beatings and elaborate rituals of humiliation. Specialist Charles A Graner, identified as a ringleader in the Abu Ghraib depravity, has worked at that prison since 1996.

Some of the worst abuses have surfaced in
Texas, America’s death penalty capital and home to more prisoners than Germany, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands combined. When George W Bush was governor, a federal judge ruled that the state’s entire penal system was pervaded by a ‘culture of sadistic and malicious violence’. Texas prison guards regularly rely on excessive force, the judge concluded, officials ignore sexual enslavement, and the state’s isolation units function as ‘virtual incubators of psychoses’.

Despite this appalling record, the
US occupation authorities in Iraq appointed a former director of the Texas prison system, Lane McCotter, to help set up operations at Abu Ghraib in May 2003. Two months earlier, McCotter’s private prison company was cited by the US Justice Department for lax supervision and mistreatment of inmates at a New Mexico jail. Before that, McCotter led Utah’s corrections department, but was forced to resign after the death of a schizophrenic inmate who had been stripped naked and strapped to a restraining chair for 16 hours.

Of course, malicious imprisonment is by no means uniquely American. Even in
Western Europe, which boasts the most rehabilitation-oriented penal systems, ghastly scandals periodically erupt. In 2000, the chief physician at Paris’s crumbling La Santé penitentiary, Veronique Vasseur, wrote a scathing exposé of ‘virtually medieval’ conditions, complete with rat infestations, rotten food, extreme temperature variations, desperate self-mutilations, bullying, drug-dealing guards, and widespread sexual assault, often perpetrated by staff.

According to a 2003 report, conditions have worsened since Dr Vasseur’s report, and
France’s overcrowded prisons are on a ‘descent to hell’. Particularly troubling is France’s protracted incarceration of pre-trial suspects. In a country that regards itself as a civilised counterweight to belligerent American hegemony, nearly half of all prisoners have never been convicted of a crime.

Why do prisons the world over concentrate such suffering and misconduct? Partly by design. Prisons herd together angry, unruly people against their will. While the best facilities provide programmes to help prisoners reintegrate into society, prisons also subject inmates to strict, often arbitrary discipline and depersonalising rituals like numbering and strip searches — practices that foster more rage than reformation.

On the other side of the bars, low-paid, often poorly trained corrections officers exercise near-absolute authority over an irascible population. In time, even the most well meaning come to regard their wards with cold detachment, if not dehumanising contempt.

Not all prisons succumb to these corrosive and polarising dynamics. But penologists recognise that certain factors — including overcrowding, insufficient guard training, detached management, shoddy infrastructure, racial tensions, and lack of public accountability — make disaster almost inevitable.

Many of these conditions pervade prisons worldwide. All of them were present in
Iraq — in addition to the strains of combat and officially approved interrogation techniques that senior US officials now admit violated the Geneva Conventions. Rather than heeding warnings from the Red Cross and others, however, Pentagon officials let dangerous prison dynamics spin out of control.

A flurry of investigations will now try to figure out what went disastrously awry at Abu Ghraib. But ensuring that ‘justice is done,’ as US Secretary of State Colin Powell promised, means that judgment must not stop at the low-ranking soldiers who were foolish enough to pose for demented snapshots. More importantly, the abuses in
Iraq demand careful scrutiny of detention practices not only there, but in our own communities as well. —DT-PS

Robert Perkinson is Assistant Professor of American Studies at the
University of Hawaii and is writing a book on the history of Texas prisons

Copyright: Project Syndicate, June 2004

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_2-6-2004_pg3_3